HAVING clause

Description

The HAVING clause applies a condition to the intermediate grouped result set that a query returns. (Redshift SQL Language Reference HAVING Clause)

The HAVING clause is fully supported in Snowflake.

Grammar Syntax

[ HAVING condition ]

Sample Source Patterns

Input Code:

Redshift

IN -> Redshift_01.sql

CREATE TABLE employee (
  id INT,
  name VARCHAR(20),
  manager_id INT
);
  
INSERT INTO employee(id, name, manager_id) VALUES
(100, 'Carlos', null),
(101, 'John', 100),
(102, 'Jorge', 101),
(103, 'Kwaku', 101),
(110, 'Liu', 101),
(106, 'Mateo', 102),
(110, 'Nikki', 103),
(104, 'Paulo', 103),
(105, 'Richard', 103),
(120, 'Saanvi', 104),
(200, 'Shirley', 104),
(201, 'Sofía', 102),
(205, 'Zhang', 104);

SELECT manager_id, COUNT(id) AS total_employees
INTO manager_employees
FROM
employee
GROUP BY manager_id
HAVING COUNT(id) > 2
ORDER BY manager_id;

Results

MANAGER_ID	TOTAL_EMPLOYEES
101	3
103	3
104	3

Output Code:

Snowflake

OUT -> Redshift_01.sql

CREATE TABLE employee (
  id INT,
  name VARCHAR(20),
  manager_id INT
)
COMMENT = '{ "origin": "sf_sc", "name": "snowconvert", "version": {  "major": 0,  "minor": 0,  "patch": "0" }, "attributes": {  "component": "redshift",  "convertedOn": "02/06/2025",  "domain": "test" }}';

INSERT INTO employee (id, name, manager_id) VALUES
(100, 'Carlos', null),
(101, 'John', 100),
(102, 'Jorge', 101),
(103, 'Kwaku', 101),
(110, 'Liu', 101),
(106, 'Mateo', 102),
(110, 'Nikki', 103),
(104, 'Paulo', 103),
(105, 'Richard', 103),
(120, 'Saanvi', 104),
(200, 'Shirley', 104),
(201, 'Sofía', 102),
(205, 'Zhang', 104);

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS manager_employees AS
  SELECT manager_id, COUNT(id) AS total_employees
  FROM
    employee
  GROUP BY manager_id
  HAVING COUNT(id) > 2
  ORDER BY manager_id;

Results

MANAGER_ID	TOTAL_EMPLOYEES
101	3
103	3
104	3

Known Issues

There are no known issues.

Related EWIs.

There are no related EWIs.